I would like to step outside of the Bible in order to step back into
the Bible - well sort of something like that. I’d like to start by stating
these basic principles that I believe most everyone would agree with. The
Bible was written by an ancient people of a different time, culture and
mentality than us. We know and understand that there are many things we
struggle to understand in the scriptures because of this fact. And because of
this, we take to the study of ancient writings, people and times. But, as we
know, not everyone does this sadly.
The battle continues over the opinions on the creation account and the
book of Genesis. Studies in the writings from the surrounding nations at the
time period of the writing of Genesis give scholars insight into the types of
writing styles and language use for the period. Through this, alternative
meanings can be discovered for words we thought we understood already.
The same principle is applied to our study of Scripture elsewhere - we
have to understand the culture and it’s use of phrases, idioms and terminology,
in order to best understand what was written in Scripture at the time.
I wish to take a look at one piece of influential literature, an
ancient writing that you have probably at least heard of its name - the Book of
Enoch. I hope to show you how this writing, which was lost or ignored by the
church for nearly two thousand years, was actually a key influential writing
that had a big impact upon our New Testament Scriptures.
Now, when it comes to the discussion of extra-biblical literature like
this, people tend to have different reactions. Mention something like the
Apocrypha to a Protestant - their instinct is to raise their fists in
preparation for a fight. When you bring up Jewish writings that come from the
biblical period, people either simply ignore or dismiss them as useless, or
simply deny they contain any truth at all, and think instead that they contain
error and myth.
We may hold to inspiration of Scripture, and we believe all of Scripture
is true, but such a view does not require that we view everything outside the
Scripture as necessarily false. Some people do exactly that, particularly when
it comes to other scripture-like material from days of old. “If it was true,
why did the early church not include it in the canon?” some may ask.